One of the first things I read made me sick; that
back in the 14th century the image of Africans held by Muslims
was: “ black people were submissive to
slavery because Negroes have little that is essentially human and have
attributes that are quite similar to those of dumb animals”. Even though they still wanted slaves, I was
impressed that the Europeans figured out they did not have to use guns and the
like to get their slaves, but they actually wanted to do so peacefully and wait
off the coast in their ships. This was
made easier for them due to the fact that a lot of the Africans were willing to
trade slaves for goods, money, guns and gunpowder as well as tobacco and
alcohol. I had not realized that during
the slavery years, that the amount of slaves that went to North America was
only 3.6% compared to such large percentages going to the Caribbean and
Brazil. They mention a few times of the
elite Africans selling their own people as slaves or trading them for goods was
also surprising but made perfect sense when Equiano spoke of one of the homes
where he stayed had the same language spoken and they lived with the same customs
he knew at his own home. The King of
Portugal had told his people they only had to write a letter to him asking what
they wanted and King Alfonso finally
wrote one, asking that he not allow the tradesman that came to their village to
totally disrupt their way of doing things. The people of the village no longer wanted their relatives sold off to
other countries. Another ridiculous
subject was the way that Osei Bonsu was so irritated that the King of England
wanted to stop shipping slaves. Making
fun of the fact that this would be the humane thing to do and stating that the
book (Quran) made by God tells them to buy slaves and teach them good
things…Very different to see views of someone who was put into slavery at the
very young of age of 11 to reading about the African elites that facilitated
traffic of slaves, then go to a letter from the same country, asking their King
to stop letting the countries he is dealing with, come into their kingdom and
take what they want. Seems that in the
end, the only people wanting the slaves were the top officials in countries
that made most of their wealth from the slave trade.
Wednesday, January 28, 2015
Tuesday, January 27, 2015
Blog #3
Chapter 14 (pp. 669-687)
Politics and religion both played roles in the
economic transformations that took place through commerce and each had
significant consequences. Eastern
markets were not very interested in European products and therefore instead of
trade, Europeans had to pay with cash/ gold and silver for their products. The Portuguese wanted to find their own sea
route to India so they did not have to deal with Venetians or Muslims. Arabs,
Persians, Indians, East Africans and some Chinese were mainly Muslims while
Hindus, Christians, Jews and Chinese also had roles in the commerce network. Portuguese wanted to have peaceful
trade. They figured out most merchants
in Indian Ocean did not have many arms or cannons like they did so they tried
to out maneuver and set up many bases within that area. Portuguese tried to control commerce to
monopolize the spice trade and for a while partially blocked the Red Sea route
which gave them control of about half of the spice trade to Europe. The Portuguese eventually carried Asian goods
to Asian ports, were outnumbered by Asian traders and ended up marrying Asian
women to get out of being controlled by the Portuguese government. Many converted to Islam. When their empire started to decline the
slack was picked up by Japan, Burma, India and Persia. Other Europeans countries wanted to get a
piece of the action for spice trade. Spain
established colonial rule in the Philippine Islands and with the majority being
Catholic, they had a major missionary effort being the only major outpost of
Christianity in Asia. Many Chinese
settled in Manilla and were essential to
Spain’s growing economic relationships.
However Spain turned hostile towards the Chinese and there were revolts
and massacres with the Spanish killing approximately 20,000 Chinese on the
island. The Dutch and English were even
more of a threat to the Spanish than the Chinese. They killed around 15,000 to take over an
island and then used slave labor to produce the crops. Europeans presence was much larger in the
Americas and Africa than in Asia. Japan
initially welcomed Europeans who had more knowledge with regards to military
technology. Christianity converted at
least 300,000 but after civil war, again Christian missionaries were destroyed,
Christianity oppressed and Japanese were forbidden to travel due to Europeans
now being regarded as a threat. Next to
spices, silver was even more of a global exchange. Silver was the first direct link between
Americas and Asia, with furs joining the global commerce next. Europeans population growth had diminished
their supply of fur bearing animals and they looked to North America for
deerskins for leather and skins besides fur. Native Americans and Siberians had
same consequences when dealing with Western European and China; this leading to
many dying because of diseases, germs, guns instead of bow and arrows and the
introduction of alcohol. The Atlantic
Slave Trade was the most profound in the network of commerce and exchange. It was an ancient practice of people owning
and selling people. So here we have had
greed, countries trying to take over certain commodities where they could get
rich because everyone wanted these items. Religions not agreeing and yet going
into wars and massive killings taking place and then the biggest of all, what
was termed as the ancient practice of slave trade... all for making a buck and
not letting everyone have a small piece of the pie instead of wanting the whole
pie for themselves.
Wednesday, January 21, 2015
Blog #2
Chapter 13 (pp. 635-649)
Different countries and their empires.
The Russians started to
expand their territory at the same time Western Europeans were making their
empires in the Americas. The Russians
started to take over the area of northern Asia that was around Moscow and pushed
themselves all the way to the Pacific Ocean, expanding in several
directions. During this push, they
encountered numerous other countrymen such as Germans, Ukrainians, and Baltic
people, to name a few, who became a part of the Russian Empire. Some areas were wanted for security purposes
to stop the agricultural people from being sold into slavery while other areas
such as the huge area of Siberia was wanted, so as to take advantage of the
large population of furry animals, which pelts were in the highest of demand
all around the world. During the 18th
century Russian, led by the empress Catherine the Great created a state agency
to look over Muslim affairs and she preached religious tolerance for
Muslims. Local people, because of the
loss of hunting grounds and pasture lands became dependent on Russian markets
for tea, tobacco, alcohol and sugar. Over
time Siberia and the steppes became part of the Russian state. “The Russian
Empire represented the final triumph of an agrarian civilization over the
hunting societies of Siberia and over the pastoral peoples of the
grasslands" (Strayer 638). Russians stayed dominant
politically but the population became overwhelmingly multiethnic while at the
same time becoming one of the biggest and wealthiest powers in Europe. The question of Christianity and Islamic
religions became more evident near the borders of China, India, Persia and the
Ottoman Empire. This Russian empire stayed its own empire until 1991 when the
Soviet Union collapsed.
Asian Empires were also
developing at this same time. Eurasia
was being taken over by the Chinese. “The Mughal Empire from Central Asia ruled
the majority of the Hindu South Asian
under a single Muslim ruled political system and the Ottoman Empire brought
Muslim rule to a largely Christian population in southeastern Europe as well as
Turkish rule to largely Arab populations of North Africa and the Middle
East”(Strayer 639). All of these Asian empires
invoked cross-cultural encounters, the importance of which would be felt
forever after.
China had its own
expansion of an empire however their rulers, who were from the area north of
the “great wall” known as the Qing dynasty, decided to not allow marriage
between the Chinese and themselves because they wanted to keep their ethnicity
separate and distinct. China eventually
took control of large areas of land, but did so not for economic reasons, but
for security as they felt threatened by the Russian Empire. This was taken care of in a peaceful manner
which marked a distinct boundary between Russia and China. Something very notable was that in the areas
where the Chinese or Qing officials had conquered or taken over regions of
land, they did not try and make people try to adhere to their Chinese culture
but allowed them to still use their own cultural ways of Muslim, Mongolian and
Tibetan ways.
In the Mughal Empire in
India, the ones who ruled and approximately 20 percent of the people were
practicing Muslims while the majority of other people there favored some
portion or another of Hinduism. In what
would appear to be a very intellectual decision, the Mughal emperor Akbar knew
that most people were practicing some kind of Hinduism and included some in
offices of the empire as well as built Hindu temples, palaces and the
like. At the same time he tried to
“soften” some of the restrictions placed on Hindu women. “Akbar imposed a policy of toleration” and
met with leaders from many different religions including Buddhist, Jewish and
Christian. Later an emperor who
succeeded Akbar, named Aurangzeb, ”reversed Akbar’s policy of accommodation to
the Hindu people and sought to impose Islamic supremacy”, all of which later
led to the demise of the Mughal Empire.
As stated in the book “The Mughal Empire was the site of a highly significant encounter between two
of the world’s greatest religious traditions. It began with an experiment in multicultural empire building and ended
in growing antagonism between Hindus and Muslims.…and that in the centuries
that followed, both elements of the Mughal experience would be repeated"(Strayer 644). Sad
state of the world, as this still happens to this day. If people were more tolerant of others’
religious beliefs, people may worship as they wish, and everyone could live
more harmoniously with others, things just might be a little more peaceful.
Saturday, January 17, 2015
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)